Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction

Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction

This assignment assesses the following intended course outcomes:

Apply the nursing process and evidence-based practice to accurately assess family and community health systems.
Apply systematic research practices to identify family and community health system needs.
Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction and health promotion.
Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction and health promotion.
In this assignment you will use the health promotion/risk reduction education or intervention plan based on the need identified in the Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal.

Don’t use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Implementation and Evaluation of Health Promotion Plan Proposal
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Develop/explain the process of implementation and evaluation for your Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal . Part of the development of the health promotion/risk reduction plan development is to include the implementation and evaluation phases of the plan. Support your processes with examples from studies you have read in this course.

In the Introduction

State the recommendations from the Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal .
In the implementation process, you are required to include the following:

Timeline for implementation and duration of the plan/intervention: state a reasonable amount of time for both based on findings from the literature. Be sure to cite your sources and explain the rationale behind the timeline.
Resources needed to implement: staffing (including level of education of required staff), physical space needed, location, sources of funding available.
Delivery of the plan: who are the community partners/stakeholders needed to implement the program? What is the point of delivery (an individual or community)? What specific interventions would be needed for the delivery?
In the evaluation process, you are required to include or identify the following:

Data description: How will you measure the outcome (what tool will be used; include an example if possible)? How will data be collected/aggregated/stored? Who should receive the outcome data? How will the outcome data be used in additional planning?
Resources needed to conduct evaluation process: staffing needed (specialists needed to evaluate outcomes); what possible sources of funding for evaluation phase; what community partnerships and stakeholders should be involved in evaluation?
Summary/Conclusion: include expected outcomes based on the literature.
This assignment will be evaluated on the following criteria:

Introduction/summary of the plan developed in Assignment 3 Part 1

10%

Implementation

30%

Timeline for implementation and duration of the plan (10%)

Resources: space, physical location, staffing needs, and funding (10%)

Delivery: community partners and stakeholders, point of delivery, and special interventions (10%)

Evaluation

30%

Description of the data collection and tool used to measure the outcome; future use of data for planning (10%)

Resources needed for evaluation: staffing and funding needed (10%)

Description of the community partners involved in the evaluation (10%)

Summary/conclusion, including expected outcomes based on the findings from the literature

20%

APA, spelling, grammar, and organization

10%

Rubric Name: Implementation and Evaluation of Health Promotion Plan Proposal
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Introduction
10 points
(9-10 points)
Clearly summarizes developed community plan
8 points
(6-8 points)
Summarizes developed community plan
5 points
(3-5 points)
Summarizes developed community plan, omits recommendations
2 points
(0-2 points)
Incomplete summary, omits recommendations
/ 10
Timeline for Implementation
10 points
(9-10 points)
Reasonable timeline for implementation and duration of intervention based on findings from the literature
8 points
(6-8 points)
Describes timeline for intervention and duration, does not describe basis for the timeline
5 points
(3-5 points)
Does not include information for implementation or duration of intervention.
2 points
(0-2 points)
Unclear regarding timeline for implementation and duration, does not state basis for the stated timeline.
/ 10
Resources for Implementation
10 points
(9-10 points)
Clearly describes needs for resources, staffing needs and funding and provides justification for these resources
8 points
(6-8 points)
Describes the needs for resources, staffing and funding, does not provide a clear justification for these resources
5 points
(3-5 points)
Incomplete description of the needed resources, ambiguous regarding the justification for these resources
2 points
(0-2 points)
Incomplete/minimal description regarding needed resources, no justification for stated resources
/ 10
Delivery
10 points
(9-10 points)
Clearly identifies community partners and stakeholders, point of delivery and describes special interventions that may be needed
8 points
(6-8 points)
Identifies community partners and stakeholders, incomplete description of point of delivery or special interventions that may be needed
5 points
(3-5 points)
Ambiguous description of community partners, incomplete description of point of delivery or special interventions that may be needed
2 points
(0-2 points)
Does not identify community partners. Incomplete or omits description of point of delivery or special interventions that may be needed
/ 10
Data description
10 points
(9-10 points)
Clearly describes the recommended data collection tool to measure the outcome based on the literature, and makes recommendations for future use of data for planning
8 points
(6-8 points)
Describes the recommended data collection tool, recommendation not based on the literature. Some recommendations made regarding the future use of data for planning
5 points
(3-5 points)
Incomplete description of the data collection tool. Unclear regarding basis of recommendation. Little to no recommendations regarding future use of data for planning
2 points
(0-2 points)
Little to no description of the data collection tool, no basis given for recommending the data collection tool, no recommendations given regarding future use of data for planning
/ 10
Resources for Evaluation
10 points
(9-10 points)
Clearly delineates resources needed for evaluation including staffing and funding needed for the evaluation process
8 points
(6-8 points)
Describes needed resources, incomplete information regarding staffing or funding for the evaluation process
5 points
(3-5 points)
Incomplete description of the resources needed. Information regarding staffing or funding for the evaluation process
2 points
(0-2 points)
Little to no information regarding the needed resources
/ 10
Community Partners needed for evaluation
10 points
(9-10 points)
Clearly describes the community partners involved in the evaluation, their stake in the program and how they will benefit
8 points
(6-8 points)
Describes the community partners involved in the evaluation, some information missing regarding their stake in the program and how they will benefit
5 points
(3-5 points)
Incomplete description of the community partners, information regarding their stake in the program or how they will benefit is missing.
2 points
(0-2 points)
Little to no information regarding community partners needed for the evaluation.
/ 10
Summary/Conclusion, including expected outcomes based on the findings
20 points
(16-20 points)
Completely summarizes the implementation and evaluation of the plan and expected outcomes based on findings from the literature
15 points
(11-15 points)
Summary is missing the implementation, evaluation of the plan, or expected outcomes based on findings from the literature
10 points
(6-10 points)
Incomplete summary of the implementation, evaluation with little information regarding expected outcomes based on the literature
5 points
(0-5 points)
Little to no summary of the implementation, evaluation and expected outcomes based on the literature
/ 20
APA, spelling, grammar, organization and references
10 points
(9-10 points)
Excellent use of APA in formatting and referencing. Excellent spelling and grammar throughout the paper. Excellent organization and easy to read. References relevant, current and from peer-reviewed journals
8 points
(6-8 points)
Minimal (1-2) mistakes in APA formatting. Appropriate referencing. Minimal mistakes in spelling a grammar. Well written and easy to read. References relevant, current not from peer-reviewed journals
5 points
(3-5 points)
Some APA (more than 2 types) and referencing mistakes. Some spelling and grammar errors. Generally well written and easy to read. Minimal organization problems. References somewhat relevant, but are not current or not from peer-reviewed journals.
2 points
(0-2 points)
Many APA, spelling, and grammar mistakes throughout the paper. Difficult to read with very little organization. References not relevant or current, not from peer-reviewed journals

PLACE AN ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET QUALITY WORK IN NO TIME.